ai-research-reproduction
Purpose
Use this as the RigorPilot Reproduce orchestrator for README-first deep learning repository reproduction. The skill guides the agent toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence; it should not micromanage implementation details that the model can infer from the repository. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; it means faithfully reading the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then recording results and deviations.
Start from the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md, then load ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md and ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning, comparability, or experiment details are at stake.
Fit
Use this skill when all are true:
- The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or
documented commands.
- The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution,
training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
- The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.
Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.
Trusted Target Selection
Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:
- documented inference
- documented evaluation
- documented training startup or partial verification
- full training only after explicit user confirmation
Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.
Workflow
- Read the README and nearby repo signals.
- Use
repo-intake-and-planto extract documented commands and candidate
targets.
- Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
- Use
env-and-assets-bootstraponly for target-specific environment,
checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
- Use
analyze-projectonly when structure, insertion points, or suspicious
implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
- Use
minimal-run-and-auditfor documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or
sanity execution.
- Use
run-traininstead when the selected trusted target is training startup,
short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
- Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could
alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
- Write the standardized outputs and give a concise final note in the user's
language when practical.
Patch Boundary
Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:
- Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency
version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
- Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State
what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
- Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic,
loss functions, or experiment meaning.
- If repository files must change, create a branch named
repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.
See references/patch-policy.md.
Outputs
Always target repro_outputs/:
SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
PATCHES.md # only if patches were applied
Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.
- Put the shortest high-value summary in
SUMMARY.md. - Put copyable commands in
COMMANDS.md. - Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in
LOG.md. - Put scientific meaning and change effects in
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md. - Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md. - Put durable machine-readable state in
status.json. - Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in
PATCHES.mdwhen needed. - Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.
Reference Loading
- Load
references/language-policy.mdwhen writing human-readable outputs. - Load
../../references/research-rigor-principles.mdbefore making
comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
- Load
../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.mdwhen dataset,
split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
- Load
references/research-safety-principles.mdbefore protocol-sensitive
decisions.
- Load
references/patch-policy.mdbefore modifying repository files. - Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather
than expanding this entrypoint.

