Summary

Audit an Anthropic Cookbook notebook based on a rubric. Use whenever a notebook review or audit is requested.

SKILL.md

Cookbook Audit

Instructions

Review the requested Cookbook notebook using the guidelines and rubrics in `style_guide.md`. Provide a score based on scoring guidelines and recommendations on improving the cookbook.

The style guide provides detailed templates and examples for:

  • Problem-focused introductions with Terminal Learning Objectives (TLOs) and Enabling Learning Objectives (ELOs)
  • Prerequisites and setup patterns
  • Core content structure
  • Conclusions that map back to learning objectives

**IMPORTANT**: Always read `style_guide.md` first before conducting an audit. The style guide contains the canonical templates and good/bad examples to reference.

Workflow

Follow these steps for a comprehensive audit:

  • **Read the style guide**: First review `style_guide.md` to understand current best practices
  • **Identify the notebook**: Ask user for path if not provided
  • **Run automated checks**: Use `python3 validate_notebook.py <path>` to catch technical issues and generate markdown
  • The script automatically runs detect-secrets to scan for hardcoded API keys and credentials
  • Uses custom patterns defined in `scripts/detect-secrets/plugins.py`
  • Checks against baseline at `scripts/detect-secrets/.secrets.baseline`
  • **Review markdown output**: The script generates a markdown file in the `tmp/` folder for easier review (saves context vs raw .ipynb)
  • The tmp/ folder is gitignored to avoid committing review artifacts
  • Markdown includes code cells but excludes outputs for cleaner review
  • **Manual review**: Read through the markdown version evaluating against style guide and rubric
  • **Score each dimension**: Apply scoring guidelines objectively
  • **Generate report**: Follow the audit report format below
  • **Provide specific examples**: Show concrete improvements with line references using the style guide templates

Audit Report Format

Present your audit using this structure:

Executive Summary

  • **Overall Score**: X/20
  • **Key Strengths** (2-3 bullet points)
  • **Critical Issues** (2-3 bullet points)

Detailed Scoring

#### 1. Narrative Quality: X/5 [Brief justification with specific examples]

#### 2. Code Quality: X/5 [Brief justification with specific examples]

#### 3. Technical Accuracy: X/5 [Brief justification with specific examples]

#### 4. Actionability & Understanding: X/5 [Brief justification with specific examples]

Specific Recommendations

[Prioritized, actionable list of improvements with references to specific sections]

Examples & Suggestions

[Show specific excerpts from the notebook with concrete suggestions for improvement]

Quick Reference Checklist

Use this to ensure comprehensive coverage:

**Introduction** (See style_guide.md Section 1)

  • [ ] Hooks with the problem being solved (1-2 sentences)
  • [ ] Explains why it matters (1-2 sentences)
  • [ ] Lists learning objectives as bullet points (2-4 TLOs/ELOs)
  • [ ] Focuses on value delivered, not machinery built
  • [ ] Optional: mentions broader applications (1 sentence)

**Prerequisites & Setup** (See style_guide.md Section 2)

  • [ ] Lists required knowledge clearly
  • [ ] Lists required tools (Python version, API keys)
  • [ ] Mentions recommended background if applicable
  • [ ] Uses %%capture for pip install to suppress output
  • [ ] Uses dotenv.load_dotenv() not os.environ
  • [ ] Defines MODEL constant at top
  • [ ] Groups related installs in single command

**Structure & Organization**

  • [ ] Has logical section progression
  • [ ] Each section teaches through demonstration
  • [ ] Code blocks have explanatory text before them
  • [ ] Includes what we learned after code blocks
  • [ ] Uses headers to break up sections

**Conclusion** (See style_guide.md Section 4)

  • [ ] Maps back to learning objectives
  • [ ] Summarizes what was accomplished
  • [ ] Suggests ways to apply

<!-- truncated -->

View raw file