Claude Code · Community skill
Board Meeting Protocol
Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.
What this skill covers
This page keeps a stable Remote OpenClaw URL for the upstream skillwhile preserving the original source content below. The shell stays consistent, and the body can vary as much as the upstream SKILL.md or README varies.
Source files and registry paths
Source path
c-level-advisor/skills/board-meeting
Entry file
c-level-advisor/skills/board-meeting/SKILL.md
Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Format
markdown-skill
Original source content
Raw file# Board Meeting Protocol Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions. ## Keywords board meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, /cs:board, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives ## Invoke `/cs:board [topic]` — e.g. `/cs:board Should we expand to Spain in Q3?` --- ## The 6-Phase Protocol ### PHASE 1: Context Gathering 1. Load `memory/company-context.md` 2. Load `memory/board-meetings/decisions.md` **(Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)** 3. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations 4. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation **Chief of Staff selects relevant roles** based on topic (not all 9 every time): | Topic | Activate | |-------|----------| | Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO | | Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO | | Hiring/org | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO | | Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO | | Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO | --- ### PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED) **No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.** Order: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO **Reasoning techniques:** CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data **Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):** ``` ## [ROLE] — [DATE] Key points (max 5): • [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴 • [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴 Recommendation: [clear position] Confidence: High / Medium / Low Source: [where the data came from] What would change my mind: [specific condition] ``` Each agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims. --- ### PHASE 3: Critic Analysis Executive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer. Checklist: - Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag) - What assumptions are shared but unvalidated? - Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?) - What risk has nobody mentioned? - Which agent operated outside their domain? --- ### PHASE 4: Synthesis Chief of Staff delivers using the **Board Meeting Output** format (defined in `agent-protocol/SKILL.md`): - Decision Required (one sentence) - Perspectives (one line per contributing role) - Where They Agree / Where They Disagree - Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth) - Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines) - Your Call (options if founder disagrees) --- ### PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️ **Full stop. Wait for the founder.** ``` ⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis] Options: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up ``` **Rules:** - User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No "but the CFO said..." - 30-min inactivity → auto-close as "pending review" - Reopen any time with `/cs:board resume` --- ### PHASE 6: Decision Extraction After founder approval: - **Layer 1:** Write full transcript → `memory/board-meetings/YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md` - **Layer 2:** Append approved decisions → `memory/board-meetings/decisions.md` - Mark rejected proposals `[DO_NOT_RESURFACE]` - Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added --- ## Memory Structure ``` memory/board-meetings/ ├── decisions.md # Layer 2 — founder-approved only (Phase 1 loads this) ├── YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded) └── archive/YYYY/ # Raw transcripts after 90 days ``` **Future meetings load Layer 2 only.** Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus. --- ## Failure Mode Quick Reference | Failure | Fix | |---------|-----| | Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force "strongest argument against" | | Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence | | Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda | | Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis | | Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads decisions.md only — hard rule | --- ## References - `templates/meeting-agenda.md` — agenda format - `templates/meeting-minutes.md` — final output format - `references/meeting-facilitation.md` — conflict handling, timing, failure modes
Related Claude Code skills
claude-skills
Board Deck Builder
Build board decks that tell a story — not just show data. Every section has an owner, a narrative, and a "so what."
claude-skills
C Level Advisory Ecosystem
A complete virtual board of directors for founders and executives.
claude-skills
C Suite Onboarding
Structured founder interview that builds the company context file powering every C-suite advisor. One 45-minute conversation. Persistent context across all roles.
claude-skills
CEO Advisor
Strategic leadership frameworks for vision, fundraising, board management, culture, and stakeholder alignment.
claude-skills
CFO Advisor
Strategic financial frameworks for startup CFOs and finance leaders. Numbers-driven, decisions-focused.
claude-skills
Change Management Playbook
Most changes fail at implementation, not design. The ADKAR model tells you why and how to fix it.